Preserve Tier2 subtype mark pass sequencing
This commit is contained in:
parent
25418c8c42
commit
fbfd41e454
2 changed files with 18 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ owners form one coupled strip:
|
|||
- also re-enters `0x00411ce0` and `0x00411ee0`
|
||||
- `0x00412fb0`
|
||||
- broader collection-load owner
|
||||
- re-enters `0x004120b0`
|
||||
- then `0x00412d70`
|
||||
- then `0x00412ab0`
|
||||
- directly loops through the stock/import stream via `0x004120b0`
|
||||
- then calls `0x00412d70`
|
||||
- then calls `0x00412ab0`
|
||||
- and only after the later catalog rebuild re-enters `0x00412c10`
|
||||
- `0x00437737`
|
||||
- late preseed of named candidate-availability records from the live pool
|
||||
|
|
@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ owners form one coupled strip:
|
|||
- `0x00412c10`
|
||||
- refreshes `[candidate+0x7ac]` from named availability
|
||||
- then tails into `0x0041eac0`
|
||||
- `0x00434d40`
|
||||
- late post-refresh sweep over collection `0x0062b26c`
|
||||
- sets `[entry+0x7b0] = 1` for subtype-`2` rows
|
||||
|
||||
## Late Bringup Placement
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -68,7 +71,7 @@ Fresh `objdump` over `RT3.exe` now makes the two key bringup checkpoints explici
|
|||
|
||||
So the late bringup strip is not just “somewhere after `0x004354a0`.” It explicitly reruns the
|
||||
recipe/runtime rebuild before the named-availability preseed and the later unconditional latch
|
||||
refresh.
|
||||
refresh, and then runs one final subtype-`2` mark pass through `0x00434d40`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Reading
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -80,6 +83,8 @@ This keeps the active Tier-2 owner question on sequencing and data handoff, not
|
|||
`0x00437737 -> 0x00434f20 -> 0x00412c10`
|
||||
- the early checkpoint only refreshes `0x00412c10` when the live candidate pool already exists,
|
||||
while the late checkpoint always reruns `0x00435630 -> 0x00437737 -> 0x00412c10`
|
||||
- the same late checkpoint then follows with `0x00434d40`, which walks `0x0062b26c` and stamps
|
||||
`[entry+0x7b0] = 1` on subtype-`2` rows
|
||||
- the remaining non-hook question is how that interaction lets candidate-table rows
|
||||
`35/43/45..66` reach `0x00412d70` with nonzero `[candidate+0xba/+0xbb]` before the later
|
||||
`0x00419230` rebank-or-clone pass consumes them
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue