Expose building source selector bytes
This commit is contained in:
parent
03fdcdf998
commit
f690a1ebd0
3 changed files with 133 additions and 19 deletions
|
|
@ -156,25 +156,26 @@ rebuild a substantial portion of each live candidate record:
|
|||
`[candidate+0x79c/+0x7a0/+0x78c/+0x790/+0x794/+0x7b0]`
|
||||
- reads the fixed per-record stream fields at
|
||||
`[candidate+0x04/+0x22/+0x26/+0x28/+0x2a/+0x2e/+0x32/+0x33]`
|
||||
- restores the selector-bank bytes
|
||||
`[candidate+0xb9/+0xba/+0xbb]`
|
||||
- allocates and streams the packed `0xbc` descriptor array into `[candidate+0x37]`
|
||||
|
||||
But in the checked `0x004120b0` body there is still **no** write to:
|
||||
|
||||
- `[candidate+0xba]`
|
||||
- `[candidate+0xbb]`
|
||||
|
||||
So the current strongest ownership split is now:
|
||||
|
||||
- direct named-availability table `[state+0x66b2]` is not the missing differentiator by itself
|
||||
- per-record stream-load `0x004120b0` is also not where the port-versus-warehouse availability
|
||||
bytes are authored
|
||||
- the surviving writer-side frontier is the later template-bank path in `0x00412d70`, where the
|
||||
imported record is cloned or reused against one bank-qualified live candidate before the runtime
|
||||
descriptor and membership rebuilds run
|
||||
- both source-record import `0x00414490` and per-record stream-load `0x004120b0` do carry the
|
||||
relevant selector-bank bytes from persisted/source state into the live candidate family
|
||||
- but the stock `Data/BuildingTypes/*.bca` corpus currently keeps `[record+0xb8/+0xb9/+0xba/+0xbb]`
|
||||
at zero across every observed file, including `Warehouse.bca` and `Port.bca`
|
||||
- so the surviving frontier is no longer “does the lower loader import `[candidate+0xba/+0xbb]`?”
|
||||
but rather which later owner or alternate content path makes the live bank-qualified split differ
|
||||
from that all-zero shipped BCA corpus before `0x00412d70` clones or reuses one bank-qualified
|
||||
live candidate
|
||||
|
||||
That makes the next Tier 2 question more concrete still:
|
||||
|
||||
- how the bank-qualified template source selected under `[candidate+0xba]` versus `[candidate+0xbb]`
|
||||
seeds the later `Warehouse%02d` side in `Louisiana.gmp`
|
||||
- how any nonzero bank-qualified template source under `[candidate+0xba]` versus `[candidate+0xbb]`
|
||||
is actually seeded above the stock all-zero BCA corpus, and then
|
||||
drives the later `Warehouse%02d` side in `Louisiana.gmp`
|
||||
- and whether that preserved bank/template state is the real bridge from the minimal recipe cluster
|
||||
to the shipped `5200 :: [7:0]` `Add Building Warehouse05` row
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue