Narrow tier2 kind-8 setup core path
This commit is contained in:
parent
8ea01c8c9f
commit
f467348d40
3 changed files with 95 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -58,6 +58,19 @@ This supports the current Tier 2 bias:
|
||||||
recipe rebuild, candidate runtime-record rebuild, and later availability-latch refresh
|
recipe rebuild, candidate runtime-record rebuild, and later availability-latch refresh
|
||||||
- not in one isolated helper or one isolated named-availability bit
|
- not in one isolated helper or one isolated named-availability bit
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
One upstream pairwise check now supports that same read:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `compare-setup-payload-core Louisiana.gmp Dutchlantis.gmp`
|
||||||
|
already differs at:
|
||||||
|
- `payload_word_0x14`: `1870` vs `2025`
|
||||||
|
- `payload_byte_0x20`: `0x3a` vs `0xfd`
|
||||||
|
- `payload_word_0x3b2`: `2` vs `1`
|
||||||
|
- candidate-header words:
|
||||||
|
`0xcdcdcdcd / 0xcdcdcdcd` vs `0x00000000 / 0x00000000`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So the current evidence no longer stops at the recipe-book lines themselves; there are already
|
||||||
|
setup-payload-core differences upstream of the coupled Tier 2 rebuild strip.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So the next recovery pass should target the internal sequencing and data handoff across:
|
So the next recovery pass should target the internal sequencing and data handoff across:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- `0x00435630`
|
- `0x00435630`
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||||
|
# Runtime Effect Kind-8 Tier2 Setup Core Note
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This note records the current setup-payload-core comparison across the six bundled add-building
|
||||||
|
carrier maps:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `Alternate USA.gmp`
|
||||||
|
- `Chicago to New York.gmp`
|
||||||
|
- `Louisiana.gmp`
|
||||||
|
- `Pacific Coastal.gmp`
|
||||||
|
- `Rhodes Unfinished.gmp`
|
||||||
|
- `Texas Tea.gmp`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The comparison uses the checked `compare-setup-payload-core` surface.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Immediate result
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The upstream setup payload already differs across the carrier set.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Observed differing fields:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `payload_word_0x14`
|
||||||
|
- `payload_byte_0x20`
|
||||||
|
- `payload_word_0x3b2`
|
||||||
|
- `candidate_header_word_0_hex`
|
||||||
|
- `candidate_header_word_1_hex`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Carrier-set shape
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Current `payload_word_0x3b2` values:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `Alternate USA.gmp = 1`
|
||||||
|
- `Chicago to New York.gmp = 2`
|
||||||
|
- `Louisiana.gmp = 2`
|
||||||
|
- `Pacific Coastal.gmp = 1`
|
||||||
|
- `Rhodes Unfinished.gmp = 1`
|
||||||
|
- `Texas Tea.gmp = 3`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
That means `Louisiana.gmp` is **not** unique on `payload_word_0x3b2`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Current candidate-header word pairs:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `Alternate USA.gmp = 0x10000000 / 0x00009000`
|
||||||
|
- `Chicago to New York.gmp = 0x00000000 / 0x00000000`
|
||||||
|
- `Louisiana.gmp = 0xcdcdcdcd / 0xcdcdcdcd`
|
||||||
|
- `Pacific Coastal.gmp = 0x00000000 / 0x00000000`
|
||||||
|
- `Rhodes Unfinished.gmp = 0x00000000 / 0x00000000`
|
||||||
|
- `Texas Tea.gmp = 0x00000000 / 0x00000000`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So `Louisiana.gmp` is currently unique among the shipped carrier set on the candidate-header
|
||||||
|
sentinel pair, while `Alternate USA.gmp` stays separately unique on the recognized
|
||||||
|
`rt3-105-map-container-v1` header pair.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Current implication
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The upstream side of the Tier 2 strip is now bounded more tightly:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- the current `Louisiana.gmp` recipe/runtime outlier status is not explained by `payload_word_0x3b2`
|
||||||
|
alone, because `Chicago to New York.gmp` also carries `2`
|
||||||
|
- but `Louisiana.gmp` does stand out on the candidate-header sentinel pair
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So the next Tier 2 upstream question is narrower:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- whether the unique `0xcdcdcdcd / 0xcdcdcdcd` candidate-header state in `Louisiana.gmp` is
|
||||||
|
relevant to the coupled
|
||||||
|
`0x00435630 / 0x00412d70 / 0x00412fb0 / 0x00412c10`
|
||||||
|
rebuild strip, or whether it is only another container-side artifact unrelated to the shipped
|
||||||
|
`Add Building Warehouse05` row.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -542,6 +542,21 @@ Working rule:
|
||||||
`0x004120b0 -> 0x00412d70 -> 0x00412ab0 -> 0x00412c10`.
|
`0x004120b0 -> 0x00412d70 -> 0x00412ab0 -> 0x00412c10`.
|
||||||
That keeps the next pass focused on the internal sequencing and handoff across the coupled
|
That keeps the next pass focused on the internal sequencing and handoff across the coupled
|
||||||
recipe/runtime/availability rebuild strip, not on one isolated helper.
|
recipe/runtime/availability rebuild strip, not on one isolated helper.
|
||||||
|
The same note now carries the first upstream feed-in difference too:
|
||||||
|
`compare-setup-payload-core Louisiana.gmp Dutchlantis.gmp` already differs on
|
||||||
|
`payload_word_0x14` (`1870` vs `2025`), `payload_byte_0x20` (`0x3a` vs `0xfd`),
|
||||||
|
`payload_word_0x3b2` (`2` vs `1`), and the candidate-header words
|
||||||
|
(`0xcdcdcdcd` vs `0x00000000`). So the next pass can now work on both sides of the coupled
|
||||||
|
Tier 2 strip: the upstream setup payload core and the downstream recipe/runtime rebuild loop.
|
||||||
|
- the carrier-set setup-core comparison is checked in now too:
|
||||||
|
`artifacts/exports/rt3-1.06/runtime-effect-kind8-tier2-setup-core-note.md`
|
||||||
|
widens that upstream comparison across all six bundled add-building carriers. It shows
|
||||||
|
`Louisiana.gmp` is not unique on `payload_word_0x3b2` (`Chicago to New York.gmp` also has `2`)
|
||||||
|
but is unique among the shipped carrier set on the candidate-header sentinel pair
|
||||||
|
`0xcdcdcdcd / 0xcdcdcdcd`, while `Alternate USA.gmp` stays separately unique on the
|
||||||
|
recognized `rt3-105-map-container-v1` header pair. That narrows the next upstream Tier 2
|
||||||
|
question to whether the `Louisiana` candidate-header state actually matters to the coupled
|
||||||
|
rebuild strip or is just another container-side artifact.
|
||||||
kinds”; it is the smaller set of scenario-specific records where that sweep explicitly writes
|
kinds”; it is the smaller set of scenario-specific records where that sweep explicitly writes
|
||||||
`[event+0x7ef]` itself or a still-later owner does.
|
`[event+0x7ef]` itself or a still-later owner does.
|
||||||
- two explicit trigger-kind materializations are now grounded inside that retagger:
|
- two explicit trigger-kind materializations are now grounded inside that retagger:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue