Rule down grouped opcode restore ownership
This commit is contained in:
parent
b937ad7e6e
commit
e3c29ae904
2 changed files with 19 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -4784,6 +4784,7 @@ fn build_periodic_company_service_trace_report(
|
|||
"the paired collection-side triplet serializer 0x00413440 is ruled down too, so the missing ordinary restored-row owner seam likely sits outside the currently bounded direct allocator/finalize/store families and the tagged 0x36b1/0x36b2/0x36b3 load-save strip".to_string(),
|
||||
"the load-side stream owner 0x00413280 is ruled down to cached-source/candidate replay through vtable slot +0x40 and 0x0040ce60, so the missing ordinary restored-row owner seam still sits beyond the current stream-load bridge too".to_string(),
|
||||
"the checked ordinary restore ordering is ruled down too: 0x00413280 stream load, 0x00481210 dynamic side-buffer refresh, and 0x004133b0 local-runtime replay all sit on the bring-up strip without re-entering 0x004134d0 / 0x0040f6d0 / 0x0040ef10 for already-restored rows".to_string(),
|
||||
"the grouped opcode dispatcher 0x00431b20 is ruled down too: current direct caller census only reaches it from scenario runtime-effect service 0x004323a0 -> 0x00432f40 via 0x00432317, so 0x0061039c currently reads as a live runtime-effect application lane rather than the missing persisted restore owner for [site+0x276]".to_string(),
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
SmpServiceConsumerHypothesis {
|
||||
|
|
@ -28745,6 +28746,15 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
&& line.contains("0x004133b0")
|
||||
&& line.contains("0x0040ef10"))
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
trace.near_city_acquisition_projection_hypotheses[0]
|
||||
.blockers
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.any(|line| line.contains("0x00431b20")
|
||||
&& line.contains("0x004323a0")
|
||||
&& line.contains("0x00432f40")
|
||||
&& line.contains("0x00432317"))
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
trace
|
||||
.near_city_acquisition_runtime_backed_input_families
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue