Record save-invariant peer-site payload stride
This commit is contained in:
parent
26848f96e6
commit
c843b55d10
1 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ Working rule:
|
|||
- the periodic-company trace now also surfaces the save-side `0x5dc1` payload/status summaries
|
||||
already parsed from the `0x36b1` triplet seam; on grounded `p.gms` the payload dword lane is
|
||||
almost entirely unique while the status kind stays `unset`, and the dominant adjacent payload
|
||||
delta is `0x00000780` across `1908` steps
|
||||
delta is `0x00000780` across `1908` steps; grounded `q.gms` shows the same dominant adjacent
|
||||
delta `0x00000780` across `1868` steps
|
||||
So the next owner question is no longer “what does the acquisition branch do?” or “which post-
|
||||
load owner replays linked-site refresh?” but “which concrete `0x00455b70` caller family applies
|
||||
to the live site rows, and which persisted lane becomes the selector bundle that ultimately
|
||||
|
|
@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ Working rule:
|
|||
`0x0040ceab -> 0x0045c150` / `0x0040d1a1 -> 0x0045c310` /
|
||||
`0x0040cd70 seeds [site+0x3cc/+0x3d0] from 0x62b2fc / 0x62b268`
|
||||
- use the new `0x5dc1` payload/status summary in the same trace as negative evidence too:
|
||||
the current `profile_payload_dword` lane behaves like a monotone ladder (`dominant adjacent
|
||||
delta 0x780`) rather than a compact selector family, so the next peer-site slice should treat
|
||||
that raw dword as a likely allocator/offset lane until a stronger selector interpretation
|
||||
appears
|
||||
the current `profile_payload_dword` lane behaves like a save-invariant monotone ladder
|
||||
(`dominant adjacent delta 0x780` on both `p.gms` and `q.gms`) rather than a compact selector
|
||||
family, so the next peer-site slice should treat that raw dword as a likely allocator/offset
|
||||
lane until a stronger selector interpretation appears
|
||||
- treat the peer-site selector seam itself as grounded enough for planning purposes
|
||||
- use the new structured restore/runtime field split in the same trace:
|
||||
restore subset
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue