Tighten Tier2 checkpoint sequencing order
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c6acbd4b3
commit
25418c8c42
2 changed files with 29 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -51,6 +51,25 @@ The preserved sequencing note keeps the late `0x197` checkpoint concrete too:
|
|||
So the late Tier-2 strip begins with named-availability preseed and latch refresh, not with the
|
||||
shell progress or territory overlay helpers that precede it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Direct Checkpoint Order
|
||||
|
||||
Fresh `objdump` over `RT3.exe` now makes the two key bringup checkpoints explicit too:
|
||||
|
||||
- early checkpoint `0x00443ebc`
|
||||
- calls `0x00435630`
|
||||
- then calls `0x00412c10` only if live candidate pool `0x0062b268` is non-null
|
||||
- then unconditionally calls `0x00412bd0`
|
||||
- then follows with `0x00434130` and `0x00436af0`
|
||||
- late checkpoint `0x00444ac1`
|
||||
- calls `0x00435630`
|
||||
- then immediately calls `0x00437737`
|
||||
- then unconditionally calls `0x00412c10`
|
||||
- then calls `0x00434d40`
|
||||
|
||||
So the late bringup strip is not just “somewhere after `0x004354a0`.” It explicitly reruns the
|
||||
recipe/runtime rebuild before the named-availability preseed and the later unconditional latch
|
||||
refresh.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Reading
|
||||
|
||||
This keeps the active Tier-2 owner question on sequencing and data handoff, not on bare naming:
|
||||
|
|
@ -59,6 +78,8 @@ This keeps the active Tier-2 owner question on sequencing and data handoff, not
|
|||
`0x00435630 -> 0x00412d70 -> 0x00412fb0`
|
||||
- the other side is the later named-availability preseed/latch family
|
||||
`0x00437737 -> 0x00434f20 -> 0x00412c10`
|
||||
- the early checkpoint only refreshes `0x00412c10` when the live candidate pool already exists,
|
||||
while the late checkpoint always reruns `0x00435630 -> 0x00437737 -> 0x00412c10`
|
||||
- the remaining non-hook question is how that interaction lets candidate-table rows
|
||||
`35/43/45..66` reach `0x00412d70` with nonzero `[candidate+0xba/+0xbb]` before the later
|
||||
`0x00419230` rebank-or-clone pass consumes them
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue