Split peer-site restore and runtime inputs
This commit is contained in:
parent
56c26d6e20
commit
1d6eed09ab
2 changed files with 29 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -114,10 +114,15 @@ Working rule:
|
|||
`0x0040ceab -> 0x0045c150` / `0x0040d1a1 -> 0x0045c310` /
|
||||
`0x0040cd70 seeds [site+0x3cc/+0x3d0] from 0x62b2fc / 0x62b268`
|
||||
- treat the peer-site selector seam itself as grounded enough for planning purposes
|
||||
- use the new structured restore/runtime field split in the same trace:
|
||||
restore subset
|
||||
`[site+0x3cc/+0x3d0]` plus `0x5dc1`-backed `[owner+0x23e/+0x242]`,
|
||||
and runtime subset
|
||||
`[site+0x04]`, `[site+0x2a8]`, `[peer+0x08]`
|
||||
- make the next periodic-company slice about the smaller shellless-simulation question instead:
|
||||
which subset of persisted site/peer fields (`[site+0x3cc/+0x3d0]`,
|
||||
`0x5dc1`-backed `[owner+0x23e/+0x242]`, `[site+0x2a8]`, `[peer+0x08]`) is actually
|
||||
sufficient to run `0x004014b0` and the city-connection sibling without shell state
|
||||
whether `0x004014b0` and the city-connection sibling only need that restore subset to
|
||||
reconstruct the runtime subset deterministically, or whether the runtime subset has to become
|
||||
an explicit headless-state contract
|
||||
- Use the higher-layer probes as the standard entry point for the current blocked frontier instead
|
||||
of generic save scans:
|
||||
`runtime inspect-periodic-company-service-trace <save.gms>`,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue