Bound compact event control-lane follow-on builder
This commit is contained in:
parent
beb6826bed
commit
13e1101156
2 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -9523,6 +9523,9 @@ fn parse_event_runtime_collection_summary_with_tag_width(
|
||||||
control_lane_notes.push(
|
control_lane_notes.push(
|
||||||
"the checked 0x0042e050 caller census is narrow too: current direct caller 0x004dba23 sits under the event-editor duplication path rather than 0x00433130 load, so ordinary 0x4e9a restore is not currently grounded to inherit trigger/control bytes through that deep-copy seam".to_string(),
|
"the checked 0x0042e050 caller census is narrow too: current direct caller 0x004dba23 sits under the event-editor duplication path rather than 0x00433130 load, so ordinary 0x4e9a restore is not currently grounded to inherit trigger/control bytes through that deep-copy seam".to_string(),
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
|
control_lane_notes.push(
|
||||||
|
"the first non-editor positive control-lane writer is bounded away from ordinary restore too: 0x00430b50 allocates a fresh live runtime-effect row through 0x00432ea0 -> 0x0042d5a0, seeds [event+0x7ef] to 2 or 3 plus adjacent control bytes, and is reached from 0x004323a0 service at 0x0043232e rather than 0x00433130 load".to_string(),
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if records_with_trigger_kind != 0 {
|
if records_with_trigger_kind != 0 {
|
||||||
control_lane_notes.push(format!(
|
control_lane_notes.push(format!(
|
||||||
|
|
@ -9784,6 +9787,9 @@ fn parse_nondirect_event_runtime_record_summary(
|
||||||
notes.push(
|
notes.push(
|
||||||
"the adjacent deep-copy seam is bounded too: current direct caller census shows 0x0042e050 reached from editor duplication at 0x004dba23, not from the ordinary 0x00433130 load path, so this non-direct row family is not currently grounded to inherit trigger/control bytes during restore through that helper".to_string(),
|
"the adjacent deep-copy seam is bounded too: current direct caller census shows 0x0042e050 reached from editor duplication at 0x004dba23, not from the ordinary 0x00433130 load path, so this non-direct row family is not currently grounded to inherit trigger/control bytes during restore through that helper".to_string(),
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
|
notes.push(
|
||||||
|
"the first non-editor positive control-lane writer is bounded away from ordinary restore too: 0x00430b50 allocates a fresh live runtime-effect row through 0x00432ea0 -> 0x0042d5a0, seeds [event+0x7ef] to 2 or 3 plus adjacent control bytes, and is only reached from the 0x004323a0 follow-on service strip rather than the 0x00433130 nondirect load path".to_string(),
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let decoded_conditions = decode_real_condition_rows(&standalone_condition_rows, None);
|
let decoded_conditions = decode_real_condition_rows(&standalone_condition_rows, None);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -22335,6 +22341,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||||
assert!(summary.control_lane_notes.iter().any(|line| {
|
assert!(summary.control_lane_notes.iter().any(|line| {
|
||||||
line.contains("0x004dba23 sits under the event-editor duplication path")
|
line.contains("0x004dba23 sits under the event-editor duplication path")
|
||||||
}));
|
}));
|
||||||
|
assert!(
|
||||||
|
summary.control_lane_notes.iter().any(|line| {
|
||||||
|
line.contains("0x00430b50 allocates a fresh live runtime-effect row")
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
assert!(summary.control_lane_notes.iter().any(|line| {
|
assert!(summary.control_lane_notes.iter().any(|line| {
|
||||||
line.contains("0x00431b20 dispatch-strip opcodes present in decoded grouped rows = [4]")
|
line.contains("0x00431b20 dispatch-strip opcodes present in decoded grouped rows = [4]")
|
||||||
}));
|
}));
|
||||||
|
|
@ -22371,6 +22382,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||||
assert!(record.notes.iter().any(|line| {
|
assert!(record.notes.iter().any(|line| {
|
||||||
line.contains("0x0042e050 reached from editor duplication at 0x004dba23")
|
line.contains("0x0042e050 reached from editor duplication at 0x004dba23")
|
||||||
}));
|
}));
|
||||||
|
assert!(
|
||||||
|
record.notes.iter().any(|line| {
|
||||||
|
line.contains("0x00430b50 allocates a fresh live runtime-effect row")
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
assert!(
|
assert!(
|
||||||
record
|
record
|
||||||
.notes
|
.notes
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -357,6 +357,13 @@ Working rule:
|
||||||
strip. So the next non-hook question is not “maybe load inherits trigger kind through
|
strip. So the next non-hook question is not “maybe load inherits trigger kind through
|
||||||
0x0042e050”; it is which other ordinary owner, if any, seeds `[event+0x7ef]` for these
|
0x0042e050”; it is which other ordinary owner, if any, seeds `[event+0x7ef]` for these
|
||||||
already-decoded non-direct rows.
|
already-decoded non-direct rows.
|
||||||
|
- the first non-editor positive control-lane writer is bounded away from restore too:
|
||||||
|
direct disassembly now shows `0x00430b50` allocating a fresh live runtime-effect row through
|
||||||
|
`0x00432ea0 -> 0x0042d5a0`, zero-initializing the full `[event+0x7ee..0x7fa]` block, then
|
||||||
|
seeding `[event+0x7ef]` to `2` or `3` plus adjacent control bytes. That builder is reached
|
||||||
|
from the `0x004323a0` follow-on service strip at `0x0043232e`, not from `0x00433130` restore.
|
||||||
|
So the remaining ordinary-owner question is narrower again: neither deep-copy inheritance nor
|
||||||
|
the first positive control-lane builder currently belongs to the non-direct `0x4e9a` load path.
|
||||||
- the positive-path caller census is effectively boxed in now too:
|
- the positive-path caller census is effectively boxed in now too:
|
||||||
direct `0x0040ef10` callers are the create-side pair `0x00403ef3 / 0x00404489`, the transport
|
direct `0x0040ef10` callers are the create-side pair `0x00403ef3 / 0x00404489`, the transport
|
||||||
tuple pair `0x0046f073 / 0x004707ff`, and the already-ruled-down live controller
|
tuple pair `0x0046f073 / 0x004707ff`, and the already-ruled-down live controller
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue