|
|
|
# opencl_fdfd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**opencl_fdfd** is a 3D Finite Difference Frequency Domain (FDFD)
|
|
|
|
solver implemented in Python and OpenCL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Capabilities**
|
|
|
|
* Arbitrary distributions of the following:
|
|
|
|
* Dielectric constant (epsilon)
|
|
|
|
* Magnetic permeabilty (mu)
|
|
|
|
* Perfect electric conductor (PEC)
|
|
|
|
* Perfect magnetic conductor (PMC)
|
|
|
|
* Variable-sized rectangular grids
|
|
|
|
* Stretched-coordinate PMLs (complex cell sizes allowed)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, only periodic boundary conditions are included.
|
|
|
|
PEC/PMC boundaries can be implemented by drawing PEC/PMC cells near the edges.
|
|
|
|
Bloch boundary conditions are not included but wouldn't be very hard to add.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The default solver (opencl_fdfd.cg_solver(...)) located in main.py implements
|
|
|
|
the E-field wave operator directly (ie, as a list of OpenCL instructions
|
|
|
|
rather than a matrix). Additionally, there is a slower (and slightly more
|
|
|
|
versatile) sovler in csr.py which attempts to solve an arbitrary sparse
|
|
|
|
matrix in compressed sparse row (CSR) format using the same conjugate gradient
|
|
|
|
method as the default solver. The CSR solver is significantly slower, but can
|
|
|
|
be very useful for testing alternative formulations of the FDFD wave equation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, this solver only uses a single GPU or other OpenCL accelerator;
|
|
|
|
generalization to multiple GPUs should be pretty straightforward
|
|
|
|
(ie, just copy over edge values during the matrix multiplication step).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:**
|
|
|
|
* python 3 (written and tested with 3.5)
|
|
|
|
* numpy
|
|
|
|
* pyopencl
|
|
|
|
* jinja2
|
|
|
|
* [fdfd_tools](https://mpxd.net/gogs/jan/fdfd_tools)
|