[docs] clarify FDFD-to-FDTD field reconstruction
This commit is contained in:
parent
e50637dc1c
commit
40efe7a450
5 changed files with 51 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,15 @@ Relevant starting examples:
|
|||
mode-weighted, and guided-mode / residual comparisons
|
||||
- `examples/fdfd.py` for direct frequency-domain waveguide excitation
|
||||
|
||||
For solver equivalence, prefer the phasor-based examples first. They compare
|
||||
the extracted `+\omega` content of the FDTD run directly against the FDFD
|
||||
solution and are the main accuracy benchmarks in the test suite.
|
||||
|
||||
`examples/waveguide_real.py` answers a different, stricter question: how well a
|
||||
late raw real snapshot matches `Re(E_\omega e^{i\omega t})` on a monitor plane.
|
||||
That diagnostic is useful, but it also includes orthogonal residual structure
|
||||
that the phasor comparison intentionally filters out.
|
||||
|
||||
The API pages are better read as a toolbox map and derivation reference:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use the [FDTD API](api/fdtd.md) for time-domain stepping, CPML, phasor
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue